
Expanding Mandate for ESG Disclosures
SEBI/HO/CFD/CMD2/P/CIR/2021/562
SEBI mandates Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework (Regulation 34(2)(f) of SEBI LODR) for Top 1000 listed entities.
SEBI/HO/CFD/CFDSEC-2/P/CIR/2023/122
Introduced “BRSR Core” subset of 9 ESG attributes and mandated reasonable assurance for top listed entities in a phased manner. Recognizing that a company’s impact extends beyond its own operations, this circular also introduced Value Chain Reporting.
SEBI/HO/CFD/CFDPoD-1/P/CIR/2024/177
Issued the Industry Standards developed by the Industry Standards Forum (ISF) comprising ASSOCHAM, FICCI, and CII, and aim to facilitate the standardisation and ease of implementation of BRSR Core disclosures.
SEBI/HO/CFD/CFDPoD-1/P/CIR/2025/42
Deferred Value Chain disclosures and assurance by one year (now applicable from FY
2025-26). Introduced a leadership indicator for Green Credits under Principle 6.
Enhancing Disclosure Integrity Through Strategic Rotation
BRSR Core Attributes
- Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Footprint
- Energy Footprint
- Water Footprint
- Embracing Circularity (Waste Management)
- Enhancing Employee Well-being & Safety
- Enabling Gender Diversity in Business
- Enabling Inclusive Development
- Fairness in Engaging with Customers & Suppliers
- Openness of Business
Compliance Timelines: For Top 1000 And Voluntary By All
While SEBI mandates specific reporting for the top listed entities by market capitalization, SEBI’s LODR (Regulation 34(2)(f)) recommends that all companies disclose their ESG practices through the BRSR framework to meet growing customer and investor requirements.
| Key Timelines in India | FY 23-24 | FY 24-25 | FY 25-26 | FY 26-27 | FY 27-28 | FY 28-29 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRSR MANDATE | Top 1000 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 |
| BRSR CORE MANDATE | Top 150 | Top 250 | Top 500 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 |
| BRSR CORE REASONABLE ASSURANCE/ASSESSMENT | Top 150 | Top 250 | Top 500 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 |
| BRSR VALUE CHAIN DISCLOSURE | – | – | Top 250 | Top 500 | Top 1000 | Top 1000 |
| BRSR VALUE CHAIN DISCLOSURES’ LIMITED ASSURANCE/ASSESSMEN | – | – | Voluntary | Mandatory | Mandatory | Mandatory |
| SEBI RECOMMENDATION FOR BRSR | – | – | More Companies | More Companies | More Companies | More Companies |
NGRBC, BRSR And JointValues’ Assurance Approach
We meet the criteria of SEBI Circular/HO/CFD/CFD-SEC-2/P/CIR/2023/122 dated 12 July 2023 and subsequent guidelines.
Clause 5.1 – “The Board of the listed entity shall ensure that the assurance provider of the BRSR Core has the necessary expertise, for undertaking reasonable assurance.”
Clause 5.2 – “The listed entity shall ensure that there is no conflict of interest with the assurance provider appointed for assuring the BRSR Core. For instance, it shall be ensured that the assurance provider or any of its associates do not sell its products or provide any non-audit / non-assurance related service including consulting services, to the listed entity or its group entities.“
Proven Expertise
Assurance by JointValues meet Global Expectations and Regulatory Scrutiny
We have successfully conducted Reasonable Assurance engagements for the BRSR Core for major public and private sector companies, including Bank of India (BOI), Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited (MDL), Coal India Limited (CIL), NLC India Limited (NLCIL), Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFC), and NIIT Learning Systems Limited.






Recommended 9+3 Model For Assurance
JointValues proposes a semi-annual data collection and assurance approach rather than waiting for the year-end deadline. This approach is strategic, aiding in de-risking annual compliance by enabling the early identification of data gaps and control weaknesses before the final report is due.
MID-YEAR SUBMISSION (Q1-Q2-Q3 DATA)
Company submits the data and draft report for 3 Quarters as per the criteria for reporting (subject matter). In case of the BRSR, as per Annexure 17A of the SEBI Master Circular dated 11 Nov 2024.
ROUND 1 ASSURANCE (Q3-Q4 PROCEDURE)
JointValues conducts the 1st round of assurance procedures, focusing on testing the design and operational effectiveness of controls and the accuracy of the submitted mid-year data.
FULL YEAR SUBMISSION (DATA AND DISCLOSURES – Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4)
Company submits its print ready disclosure/report for the full reporting period to JointValues.
ROUND 2 ASSURANCE (Q1 OF SUBSEQUENT FY)
JointValues executes the final round of assurance procedures, leading to the issuance of the formal opinion on the full-year data and report.
Alternatively, as a conventional approach, comprehensive review and assurance process is conducted entirely after the closure of the financial year.
Assurance Team Structure
To ensure no conflict of interest, maintain quality control, and adhere to ISAE 3000 standard, our engagement team is structured across three distinct layers:
- Execution & Verification: Assurance Team Members perform the actual fieldwork, data verification, and documentation. They are the primary point of contact for data collection from the Company.
- Oversight & Control: The Internal Quality Control (IQC) Team applies an internal maker-checker system (as required by ISAE 3000). They review the work of Layer 1 to ensure independence and quality across the engagement before it reaches the signatory.
- Final Authority & Sign-Off: The Lead Assurer & Signatory provides final oversight on ethics, quality, and issues the official assurance opinion. They bear the ultimate responsibility for the assurance statement.

Our Alignment With Ethics And International Quality Standards

Ethical Requirements
JointValues’s Code of Conduct aligns with the best practices and the International Code of Ethics (ICE) for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA). This ensures our team remains objective and unbiased.

Quality Management
JointValues adhere to quality controls in line with the International Standards on Quality Management (ISQM). This ensures a high-quality, systematic engagement where every output is vetted before release.
Assurance Methodology: ISAE 3000 (Revised)
Phase 1: Planning and Risk Assessment
We assess the appropriateness of various assumptions, estimations, and materialitythresholds used by the Company for data analysis. We identify which quantitative or qualitative misstatements could actually influence the decisions of the Report’s intended users (investors, regulators).
We assess the risk of material misstatement due to errors (unintentional mistakes) or fraud(intentional manipulation) in the Company’s information system and control environment.
We assess the internal control mechanisms for collecting, collating, and reporting thesubject matter data, as per the SEBI Circular for BRSR Core. This helps us determine if your systems are capable of producing reliable data.
Phase 2: Evidence Gathering and Testing (Execution)
Detailed interactions with relevant personnel responsible for Sustainability, ESG, HR, EHS, and theirteams through virtual and physical meetings to understand the process flow and data lineage.
Performing analytical procedures to analyze trends in the historical data (e.g., comparing Year-on-Year energy consumption) and ascertain the reasonableness of the data reported in the current year.
Vouching underlying source documents (e.g., electricity bills, fuel invoices, wastemanifests, accident registers, statutory returns) against the reported data. This includes assessing records and performing testing, including the recalculation of sample data to verify formula accuracy.
On-site visits to a sample of [Number] locations to validate physical assets (e.g., verifying theexistence of a treatment plant), operational controls, and raw data generation processes.
Phase 3: Finalising Assurance Opinion and Reporting
We issue a Draft Assurance Statement and a Management Report. The Management Report is avalue-add document detailing findings, gap analysis, and recommendations for improvement.
The formal, signed Independent Assurance Opinion is issued after management acceptance isreviewed on the draft.
This is contingent upon whether any finding is withinthe material threshold for the assurance period but may pose a risk in the future, or if a modified or qualified opinion is required. It serves as a tool for continuous improvement.
Assurance Specialists
JointValues integrates diverse technical specializations to address core ESG attributes of BRSR and Sustainability Reports.

JS Kamyotra (Lead Assurer and Signatory)

Kaustav Dutta

Rakesh Gupta

Santosh Bhattacharya

Dr. Vishal Kaushik

Satya Mishra

Ritu Tomar

Vedanshi Singh

Ayush Vadgama
